Skip to main content

Issue - meetings

THE PLANS LIST

Meeting: 05/01/2022 - Planning Committee (Item 137)

137 THE PLANS LIST (00-21-09) pdf icon PDF 541 KB

To consider the planning applications contained in the list.

 

Minutes:

The Committee considered the applications on the *Plans List

 

Note: *List previously circulated and attached to the minutes

 

Applications dealt with without debate.

 

In accordance with its agreed procedure the Committee identified those applications contained in the Plans List which could be dealt with without debate.

 

RESOLVED that the following application be determined or otherwise dealt with in accordance with the various recommendations contained in the list namely:

 

a)    Application 21/02289/CLP –Certificate of lawfulness for the proposed erection of a single storey rear extension at 79 Queensway, Tiverton be approved as recommended by the Interim Development Management Manager.

 

(Proposed by the Chairman)

 

Reason for the decision: As set out in the report

 

b)     Application 21/01879/FULL – Change of use of storage area to outdoor seating area for host visitors for tastings and similar activities and erection of bar/shed – Exe Valley Brewery, Land Farm, Silverton

 

The Planning Officer presented updates to his report stating that an additional letter from the objector had been received with regard to the 2017 planning permission for the site and he confirmed that the planning permission was for the land and that permission was granted.  He also confirmed the reason for the call in and that an amendment to Condition 3 had been proposed.

 

The Officer then answered questions posed in Public Question Time, stating that the access lane had been considered, there had been no objection from the Highways Authority, there were no grounds for refusal as this was an existing brewery, with regard to ownership, any application stayed with the land and the right amount of notice had been given, the land and the brewery had operated since 1980, it was an established business and this would have been known by the objector when he purchased his property.  The issue of amenity had been addressed within the report, conditions had been put in place and he reminded the meeting that the permission would be temporary.

 

He then outlined the contents of the report by way of presentation highlighting the site location plan, a block plan, floor plans, elevations, the fencing screen, the supporting information and photographs from various aspects of the site.  He confirmed that the business had operated since the 1980’s, Policy DM18 did support expansion of the business and the impact on the neighbouring property had been considered.

 

 

Consideration was given to:

 

·         Whether the application conflicted with Policy DM5

·         Whether further consideration of the application should have been considered by the Highway Authority

·         Parking arrangements on the site and the nature of the events that were being proposed

·         Highway issues with regard to the Open Days that had and would take place

·         The number of events that could take place without permission on an annual basis

·         The views of the objector with regard to the impact of the proposal on his property, the lack of shelter proposed if it rained, noise, smells, disruption, the number of people in attendance, loss of privacy and amenity, parking issues and the fact that there  ...  view the full minutes text for item 137