Decision details

Council Offices, Crediton

Find out more about this issue

Decision Maker: Cabinet

Decision status: Recommendations Approved

Is Key decision?: Yes

Is subject to call in?: Yes

Purpose:

To consider a report of the Director of Finance, Assets and Resources

Decisions:

The Cabinet had before it a * report of the Director of Finance, Assets and Resources outlining options for the future use of the Crediton Office.

The Cabinet Member for Housing outlined the contents of the report outlining the six options available for consideration.

RESOLVED that recommendation 3 in the report be approved and recommendation 6 in the report also be approved, namely: that the Land Charges Service be notified of the intention to sell the Crediton Office building and that the local community be informed that the property had been registered as an asset of community value.

(Proposed by Cllr R L Stanley and seconded by Cllr C R Slade).

Notes

(i) Cllr C R Slade declared a personal interest as he was the Council representative on the Community Transport Association who used the Crediton Office;

(ii) Cllrs K I Busch and Mrs M E Squires requested that their abstention from voting be recorded;

(iii) * Report previously circulated.

Report author: Andrew Jarrett

Publication date: 03/10/2017

Date of decision: 28/09/2017

Decided at meeting: 28/09/2017 - Cabinet

Effective from: 07/10/2017

This decision has been called in by:

Sally Gabriel who writes The Chairman of the Scrutiny Committee has called in the decision for the following reasons: Call – In – Crediton Office Potential Sale 1 to consider whether, how and why the proposed outcome for the future of the Crediton Office changed in 2017 and whether such change was justified on the evidence and information available 2 to consider why the basis for the disposal of the Crediton Office differed from that made for the disposal of Tiverton Town Hall 3 to understand what consultation has taken place with interested parties prior to the decision and the outcome of such consultation 4 to look at the options put forward to Cabinet, to examine the equality impact of such options and then to consider whether there were reasonable alternative options that were not considered "

Restricted enclosure View reasons restricted