Cabinet had before it a report
* from the Director of Place and Economy on the S106 Governance
Framework.
The Cabinet Member for Housing,
Assets and Property outlined the contents of the report with
particular reference to the following:
-
This was an update to the existing S106 governance
arrangements.
-
It had been revised to ensure the most appropriate
and effective approach to S106 management and monitoring, to ensure
that they were consistent with the latest government regulations
and to provide Members with more visibility and input into the
spend process.
-
Any financial planning obligations must be spent in
accordance with the terms of the S106 agreement. Those agreements
were used to offset the implications of an individual development
as identified through the planning process and therefore it was
important to have a robust and appropriate governance to ensure the
effective and appropriate use of S106 monies.
-
The proposed governance framework (Appendix 1),
which set out the arrangements on the nature of the S106 spend, and
provided clarity in terms of when decisions were delegated to
planning officers, and the conditions where more significant
decisions needed to go the Governance Board for
consideration.
-
Also included, were the Terms of Reference, which
set out the purpose and expectations of the Board and the decision
making process, including composition of the Governance Board and
regularity of meetings.
The framework document and
appended terms of reference were considered by the Planning,
Environment and Sustainability Policy Development Group at a
meeting on 26 November 2024. The Group agreed that the framework
document and appended terms of reference be recommended to Cabinet
for approval, with one minor amendment, which was to add the word
‘Infrastructure’ at the end of bullet point 9, at 4.0
Planning obligations (Section 106 agreements) so that the bullet
point read
‘Highways and Transport
Infrastructure’, to ensure wider transport schemes such as
rail related projects were captured.
Discussion took place
regarding:
-
The timelines on spending and the balance of
priorities.
-
Key challenges, such as balancing local and
district-wide strategic priorities and enhancing Member
oversight.
-
Clarity was needed in certain areas. Delegated
decisions allowed for more streamlined approvals, what was the
route of appeal should a validation or delegated decision be
contested?
-
Were the Governance Board decisions
final?
-
Disappointed by the lack of progress on the
Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL).
-
Opportunities to review the structure to further
enhance inclusivity and transparency, particularly with respect to
representation from Ward Members and Town and Parish
Councils.
-
Further clarity on the new government’s
direction regarding the emerging Infrastructure Levy (IL), and
would the Council prioritise preparing for this transition and
consider aligning infrastructure planning processes
accordingly?
RESOLVED that the revised S106 Governance arrangements (Appendix 1; Mid Devon
District Council S106 Governance Framework) be APPROVED with the following exceptions.
a)
This would require a change to the Terms of
Reference section 4 under the Fixed Panel heading before bullet
point four the following words to be added “three Cabinet
Members from the following:”
b)
A new ...
view the full minutes text for item 107