• Calendar
  • Committees
  • Decisions
  • Election results
  • ePetitions
  • Forthcoming Decisions
  • Forward Plans
  • Library
  • Meetings
  • Outside bodies
  • Parish councils
  • Search documents
  • Subscribe to updates
  • Your councillors
  • Your MPs
  • Your MEPs
  • What's new
  • Issue - meetings

    Performance & Risk

    • Issue Details
    • Issue History
    • Related Meetings
     

     

    Meeting: 18/06/2018 - Scrutiny Committee (Item 27)

    27 PERFORMANCE & RISK UPDATE (1-42-05) pdf icon PDF 73 KB

    Group Manager for Performance, Governance and Data Security to provide Members with an update on performance against the corporate plan and local service targets for 2018-2019 as well as providing an update on the key business risks.

    Additional documents:

    • Environment PDG Performance Report Appendix 1, item 27 pdf icon PDF 145 KB
    • Homes PDG Performance Report Appendix 2, item 27 pdf icon PDF 119 KB
    • Economy PDG Performance report Appendix 3, item 27 pdf icon PDF 138 KB
    • Community PDG Performance Appendix 4, item 27 pdf icon PDF 114 KB
    • Food Hygiene Data 2017 Appendix 4a, item 27 pdf icon PDF 35 KB
    • Corporate Performance and Report Appendix 5_, item 27 pdf icon PDF 167 KB
    • Risk Report Appendix 6, item 27 pdf icon PDF 779 KB
    • Risk Matrix Appendix 7, item 27 pdf icon PDF 53 KB

    Minutes:

    The Group had before it and NOTED a *report from the Director of Corporate Affairs and Business Transformation providing an update on performance against the Corporate Plan and local service targets for 2017-18 as well as providing an update on the key business risks.

     

    The Group Manager for Performance, Governance and Data Security outlined the contents of the report highlighting the targets against the Corporate plan  aims and providing information from queries raised:

     

    ·         Reducing the carbon footprint and the schemes available

     

    ·         A correction to the number of affordable homes delivered which was 115 and not 92.

    ·         Social media communication and whether a figure for the number of “likes” could be considered

    ·         With regard to the risks why the level of risk was high for Information Security and the reasoning as to why it had to remain high.

     

    Note: *Report previously circulated.