Venue: Phoenix Chamber, Phoenix House, Tiverton
Contact: Andrew Seaman Member Services Manager
Link: audiorecording
No. | Item |
---|---|
Apologies To receive any apologies for absence. Minutes: Councillor D J Knowles had given his apologies. |
|
Public Question Time To receive any questions relating to items on the Agenda from members of the public and replies thereto.
Minutes: The following questions were received from members of the public:
Nick Quinn
My first Question concerns Item 8: Budget 23/24 Update
The Summary of Capital Expenditure and Funding, at Appendix 4 of the Budget Update, now shows “Other General Fund Projects” costing more than £50 Million over the next 5 years. The expenditure figures for these projects very closely match the increased “Borrowing 50yr” funding figures.
This is extremely long borrowing term to be used to fund 3 Rivers projects and is in direct contradiction to the assurance given by the Deputy Chief Executive to the Audit Committee, in November, that the Council “would not conduct medium to long term borrowing on projects that had a lifespan of less than 2 years”.
Since it started, 3 Rivers has never paid any dividends to the Council and the External Auditor has publicly stated that 3 Rivers are increasing their current loan impairment to £1.6 Million.
Q1. Are Cabinet seriously considering recommending that the Council should mortgage itself, for the next 50 years, to fund some short term building projects by a commercial Company that has never paid any dividends and is about to further impair its existing loans?
My second question concerns Item 14: 3 Rivers Business Plan
The Public Report shows that the 3 Rivers Business Plan was critically assessed by Scrutiny and Audit Committees - the feedback was that “the business plan in its current form was not supported”.
Now, it seems, a “Mark 2” plan has been produced - but neither Scrutiny nor Audit Committees have been given the opportunity to comment on it.
Q2: Why is Cabinet considering a revised 3 Rivers Business Plan without the input of Scrutiny and Audit Committees?
The Leader thanked the resident for their questions and responded to question 2, the Leader explained that the 5 year business plan had gone through the Audit and Scrutiny Committees and they had made their recommendations.
Question 1 was answered during item 8 and it was explained by the Deputy Chief Executive that with regards to capital borrowing within the capital medium term financial plan, the Council’s capital borrowing will always match the lifespan of a capital project. Any borrowing taken over 25 to 50 years would be for housing delivery. Capital would always match life of assets
Note – The Leader had rejected questions from two members of the public. |
|
Declarations of Interest under the Code of Conduct To record any interests on agenda matters.
Minutes: None declared. Members were reminded of the need to make declarations where appropriate. |
|
Minutes of the Previous Meeting PDF 265 KB To consider whether to approve the minutes as a correct record of the meeting held on 29 November 2022. Minutes: The minutes of the previous meeting were approved as a correct record and signed by the Leader. |
|
Financial Monitoring To receive a verbal update from the Deputy Chief Executive (S151) presenting a financial update in respect of the income and expenditure so far in the year. Minutes: The Cabinet were presented, and NOTED a financial update in respect of the income and expenditure so far in the year. The following was highlighted:
|
|
LGA Peer Challenge Review – Follow Up PDF 392 KB Report of the Chief Executive. Minutes: The Cabinet were presented and NOTED a *report from the Chief Executive which updated Member’s on the progress made towards addressing or implementing the recommendations arising from the peer review team during 2022.
It was highlighted that the Local Government Association held a meeting with Mid Devon District Council on the 20 December 2022 to which a number of Officers and Members attended.
In addition disagreement was raised on part of the report that related to the cost of planning decisions. The Leader explained that the decisions of Committees were not relevant to the agenda item before the Cabinet.
Note: *report previously circulated and attached to the minutes |
|
Cullompton Town centre Relief Road - Update PDF 230 KB Report of the Director of Place. Minutes: The Cabinet were presented a *report from the Director of Place which presented Members with a recommendation to request the release of a tranche of Housing Infrastructure Fund (HIF) monies. This was to facilitate the continued progression of technical work relating to the Cullompton Town Centre Relief Road (CTCRR) until the end of March 2023, by which time a decision from Government regarding the Council’s pending Levelling Up Fund bid should have been received and any grant agreement agreed.
Members discussed the following:
The Chief Executive added that the levelling up bid decisions should be announced by the end of January 2023. He also explained that the Junction 25 project had been planned for a number of years and that this development in particular was on a much larger scale.
It was therefore RESOLVED:
(Proposed by Cllr R Chesterton and seconded by Cllr C Slade)
Reason for Decision: As stated in the report.
Note: *report previously circulated and attached to the minutes |
|
Budget 23/24 - Update PDF 379 KB Report of the Deputy Chief Executive and S151 Officer. Additional documents:
Minutes: The Cabinet were presented a *report from the Deputy Chief Executive (S151) which provided an update on the 2023/24 Budget position and discussed further options for cost savings or income generation.
The Deputy Chief Executive (S151) highlighted that the financial settlement had been delivered with estimates that were close to the Council’s financial position. This settlement provided a 3% minimum baseline for all Councils.
In addition, the resident survey responses would be provided to the Policy Development Groups (PDG) for comment and that the Council’s general fund was circa £900,000 away from a balanced position. In addition, proposals with facilitated discussion were upcoming with the four PDGs.
Members discussed the following:
It was therefore RESOLVED: That Cabinet
(Proposed by Cllr R Deed and seconded by Cllr C Slade)
Reason for Decision: As stated in the report.
Note: * report previously circulated and attached to the minutes
|
|
Report of the Deputy Chief Executive and S151 Officer. Minutes: Cabinet were presented a *report which provided detail on the statutory calculations necessary to determine the Tax Base for the Council Tax. The calculations followed a formula laid down in Regulations.
The Deputy Chief Executive (S151) highlighted that the collection rate would be lowered by 1% in light of the cost of living crisis. In addition, from 2024, provided that legislation be approved, there would be the doubling of the second home council tax charge. Finally, the premium council tax charge on long term empty properties would not be enacted until April 2024.
Members discussed the following:
It was therefore RESOLVED to RECOMMEND to Council:
(Proposed by Cllr R Deed and seconded by Cllr C Eginton)
Reason for Decision: As stated in the report.
Note: *report previously circulated and attached to the minutes |
|
Access to Information - Exclusion of Press and Public Discussion with regard to the next items, may require the Cabinet to pass the following resolution to exclude the press and public having reflected on Article 12 12.02(d) (a presumption in favour of openness) of the Constitution. This decision may be required because consideration of this matter in public may disclose information falling within one of the descriptions of exempt information in Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972. The Policy Development Group would need to decide whether, in all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption, outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information.
Recommended that under Section 100A(4) of the Local Government Act 1972 the public be excluded from the next item of business on the grounds that it involves the likely disclosure of exempt information as defined in paragraph 3 respectively of Part 1 of Schedule 12A of the Act, namely information relating to the financial or business affairs of any particular person (including the authority holding that information) Minutes: The Leader indicated that discussion with regard to the following items, may require the Cabinet to pass the following resolution to exclude the press and public having reflected on Article 12 12.02(d) (a presumption in favour of openness) of the Constitution. This decision may be required because consideration of this matter in public may disclose information falling within one of the descriptions of exempt information in Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972. The Cabinet would need to decide whether, in all the circumstances of the case, the public interest in maintaining the exemption, outweighs the public interest in disclosing the information.
RESOLVED: That, in accordance with Part I of Schedule 12A to the Local Government Act 1972, the press and public be excluded from the meeting for the following items 11, 12, 13 and 14 of business, for the reason set out below:
(Proposed by the Leader)
|
|
Planning and Design Consultancy Services 2023 - 2026, Award report PDF 138 KB Report of the Corporate Manager for Public Health, Regulation and Housing
Additional documents:
Minutes: The Cabinet received a *report from the Corporate Manager for Public Health, Regulation and Housing which advised Members on the results for the tendering of the Planning and Design Consultancy Services 2023-2026 and to confirm the award of the contract.
The meeting returned to open session.
It was therefore RESOLVED:
(Proposed by Cllr S Penny and seconded by Cllr R Chesterton) Reason for Decision: As stated in the report.
Note: *report previously circulated to Members but not attached to the minutes as restricted |
|
Following a report of the Deputy Chief Executive (S151), the Scrutiny Committee made the following recommendations:
1. That the Cabinet refer the matter to full Council
The Audit Committee made the following recommendations:
1. That the Audit Committee recommend to the Cabinet that more detail of the risks and various options going forward be sought from the S151 Officer.
2. That the other options be included in the business plan and consequences of not supporting it need to be highlighted.
3. That the Audit Committee feeds back to Cabinet that it recommends that the business plan in its current form is not supported due to the level of risk to the Council from the likelihood of needing to impair loans on those projects with very narrow rates of return. Additional documents:
Minutes: The Cabinet received a *report from the Deputy Chief Executive which asked Members to review the business plan of 3 Rivers Developments Ltd. As well as 2 reports from items 12 and 13 which provided Cabinet with a business case for a second development scheme at Bampton and a business case for a 6 unit residential development scheme in Tiverton which were included in the 3 River’s Developments Ltd company’s recent Business Plan.
The meeting returned to open session.
It was therefore RESOLVED that
(Proposed by Cllr R Deed and seconded by Cllr C Eginton)
Reason for Decision: Cabinet agreed with the Scrutiny Committee’s recommendation. But Scrutiny did not recommend that the developments in Bampton and Park road be referred to Council? |
|
Notification of Key Decisions PDF 346 KB To note the contents of the Forward Plan. Minutes: The Cabinet had before it, and NOTED, the notification of *Key Decisions
Note: *Key Decisions previously circulated and attached to the minutes |