The Committee had before it, a
report * from the Director of Legal, HR & Governance
(Monitoring Officer) outlining the Government Consultation,
enabling remote attendance and proxy voting at Council
meeting.
The Director of Legal, HR &
Governance (Monitoring Officer) outlined the content of the report
with particular reference to the following:
- ‘Enabling remote attendance and proxy voting at local
authority meetings’, with the consultation closing on the 19
December 2024.
- This
consultation seeks views on the detail and practical implications
of allowing remote and hybrid attendance at local authority
meetings.
- The
possible introduction of proxy voting for those occasions when an
elected member, due to personal circumstances, may be unable to
attend even remotely. For example, during maternity, paternity or
adoption leave.
- The
Standards committee to debate and review ahead of the response
being submitted after it would be presented to Full Council next
week.
The following was
discussed:
- The Motion
563 from the 19th of May 2020.
a) This Council resolved to hold all member
briefings and working/advisory groups (where practicable) remotely
in the future which would aid the reduction of carbon emissions and
provided significant savings on Members travel expenses.
b) This Council agreed to lobby central Government
requesting that Regulation 5 of the Local Authorities and Police
and Crime Panels (Coronavirus) (Flexibility of Local Authority and
Police and Crime Panel meetings) (England and Wales) Regulations
2020 be extended past May 2021 and be formed into new legislation
allowing Members to have the option to attend any meeting of the
Council either in person or remotely.
- Members
that were present when meetings were online and had the flexibility
to keep their function as a Councillor.
- Measures
that would be in place for those attending and distractions that
may take place with meetings being held online.
- The option
for hybrid meetings rather than just online, the engagement from
members in a room.
- Full
Council to remain in person only for Councillors to come
together.
- Question 5
of the consultation and the figures that had been put
forward.
- That remote
attendance at meetings was generally welcomed across the
committee.
- The Members
of the Committee did not wish to see a return to fully remote
meetings.
- The role of
Chair should be in person for meetings.
- Further
discussions would be required on how the Council might implement
the changes.
- Setting
rules around attendance of meeting online or if they were not to
attend similar to the rules around sending substitutes to
meeting.
- Physical
presents of members, officers and Members of the public
present.
- On
occasions where a person was unwell, should they be attending
meetings at all, even remotely?
- Remote
meetings would be helpful in cases of inclement weather (flooding,
snow etc) and would allow the meeting
to still take place and that attendance and voting would be
recognised.
- The
Standards Committee expressed concerns over this particular
proposal, with the governance of the proposal being of significant
concern.
- A lack of
clarity of how proxy voting would work when amendments were moved
at a meeting, for example;
- Whether the
use of proxy voting could be seen as predetermination.
- If the
responses to the consultation from the discussion the evening be
circulated to members of the Committee first before it goes to Full
Council.
It was therefore RESOLVED the Standards Committee recommend to Full Council
that:
- That the
Council NOTED the Government
Consultation.
- The
Director of Legal, People & Governance (Monitoring Officer) be
delegated to respond to the Government with the Councils
response.
(Proposed by the Chair)
Note: * Report
previously circulated.