The Committee had before it, a
report * from the Director of Legal, HR & Governance
(Monitoring Officer) outlining the Government Consultation,
enabling remote attendance and proxy voting at Council
meeting.
The Director of Legal, HR &
Governance (Monitoring Officer) outlined the content of the report
with particular reference to the following:
- ‘Enabling
remote attendance and proxy voting at local authority
meetings’, with the consultation closing on the 19 December
2024.
- This consultation
seeks views on the detail and practical implications of allowing
remote and hybrid attendance at local authority
meetings.
- The possible
introduction of proxy voting for those occasions when an elected
member, due to personal circumstances, may be unable to attend even
remotely. For example, during maternity, paternity or adoption
leave.
- The Standards
committee to debate and review ahead of the response being
submitted after it would be presented to Full Council next
week.
The following was
discussed:
- The Motion 563 from
the 19th of May 2020.
a) This Council resolved to hold all member
briefings and working/advisory groups (where practicable) remotely
in the future which would aid the reduction of carbon emissions and
provided significant savings on Members travel expenses.
b) This Council agreed to lobby central Government
requesting that Regulation 5 of the Local Authorities and Police
and Crime Panels (Coronavirus) (Flexibility of Local Authority and
Police and Crime Panel meetings) (England and Wales) Regulations
2020 be extended past May 2021 and be formed into new legislation
allowing Members to have the option to attend any meeting of the
Council either in person or remotely.
- Members that were
present when meetings were online and had the flexibility to keep
their function as a Councillor.
- Measures that would
be in place for those attending and distractions that may take
place with meetings being held online.
- The option for hybrid
meetings rather than just online, the engagement from members in a
room.
- Full Council to
remain in person only for Councillors to come together.
- Question 5 of the
consultation and the figures that had been put forward.
- That remote
attendance at meetings was generally welcomed across the
committee.
- The Members of the
Committee did not wish to see a return to fully remote
meetings.
- The role of Chair
should be in person for meetings.
- Further discussions
would be required on how the Council might implement the
changes.
- Setting rules around
attendance of meeting online or if they were not to attend similar
to the rules around sending substitutes to meeting.
- Physical presence of
Members, officers and Members of the public.
- On occasions where a
person was unwell, should they be attending meetings at all, even
remotely?
- Remote meetings would
be helpful in cases of inclement weather (flooding, snow
etc) and would allow the meeting to
still take place and that attendance and voting would be
recognised.
- The Standards
Committee expressed concerns over this particular proposal, with
the governance of the proposal being of significant
concern.
- A lack of clarity of
how proxy voting would work when amendments were moved at a
meeting, for example;
- Whether the use of
proxy voting could be seen as predetermination.
- If the responses to
the consultation from the discussion the evening be circulated to
members of the Committee first before it goes to Full
Council.
It was therefore RESOLVED the Standards Committee recommend to Full Council
that:
- That the Council
NOTED the Government Consultation.
- The Director of
Legal, People & Governance (Monitoring Officer) be delegated to
respond to the Government with the Councils
response.
(Proposed by the Chair)
Note: * Report
previously circulated.