The Cabinet had before it a
report * from the Deputy Chief Executive (S151) presenting the
2025/2026 draft Budget Report.
The Cabinet Member for
Governance, Finance and Risk outlined the contents of the report
with particular reference to the following:
- The delivery of a
fully balanced budget, not only maintaining the general fund
reserves above required minimum, but making a net contribution to
earmarked reserves, building resilience for future
periods.
- This administration
had stayed true to their principles: sound financial management,
investment in the future, and delivering for communities, even in
the face of adversity. They had demanded better support, funding
and decision making for their residents and would continue to do
so.
- This budget was the
culmination of extensive collaboration over the past year. It had
been scrutinised at every level by ten Policy Development Group
meetings (PDG’s), by this Cabinet five times, by Scrutiny
Committee, and in an all-Member briefing.
- Every single
Councillor had had the opportunity to contribute, because the
funding and delivery of the Council’s services was not just a
matter for the administration; it was a matter for every elected
Member and the residents they served.
- The Capital Programme
worth £135.6 million, with £41.6 million of deliverable
investment in 2025/26 alone. This was about building the
infrastructure, ensuring the Council invested in the future rather
than leaving liabilities for the next generation.
- The Council’s
capital investments included social housing development, ensuring
that the Council continued to deliver high-quality, affordable
homes for residents. Also, the Council was making targeted
investments in waste and environmental services, responding to new
regulatory requirements and preparing for the future.
- It included a fully
funded provision for the Cullompton
Town Centre Relief Road, a project that had been promised for many
years, and would finally be delivered under this
administration.
- The Treasury
Management Strategy ensured the Council would
remain financially stable and well-governed, taking a prudent
approach to borrowing, maximising internal resources, and ensuring
that every pound of public money was used wisely.
- The Minimum Revenue
Provision (MRP) policy ensured that repaying debt responsibly,
secured the long-term financial sustainability of this
Council.
- The General Fund and Housing Revenue Account (HRA) Budget had
been a huge challenge throughout the budget-setting process, with
councils across the country facing relentless financial pressures.
This Council had delivered a balanced budget that protected and
enhanced key services.
Ø
Increased funding for tackling Net Zero and Planning
Enforcement—investing in sustainability and ensuring that
this Council held developers to account.
Ø
Expansion of Apprenticeship Scheme—investing
in the future workforce and providing real opportunities for young
people.
Ø
Continuing an ambitious social housing programme,
ensuring the provision of good-quality homes and correcting the
historic rent calculation error in a responsible way.
Ø
Growth in income streams, particularly from thriving
leisure memberships and higher recycling levels, ensured that
income was generated from services that would benefit the Councils
residents.
- Unfortunately, one of
the biggest challenges, was Central Government.
Once again, this Council had
been handed another single-year settlement, making long-term
financial planning nearly impossible. The lack of certainty left
councils like ours in a constant state of financial firefighting,
unable to plan properly for the future.
- This Council faced an
expected additional cost of £466,000 as a result of the
Government’s increases to employer’s national insurance
contributions. Despite reassurances,
the Council would only be receiving £151,000 in funding,
essentially diverting the regressive Council Tax away from local
services to Central Government. As if that was not enough, the
Government had arbitrarily slashed key grants at the last minute,
including the Rural Services Delivery Grant, leaving Mid Devon with
an 18% cut in real-terms funding. This was a direct hit on rural
district councils, making it even harder to deliver essential
services without increasing the financial burden on residents, this
was in the same week as the Government launched its latest
Devolution White Paper.
- Devolution and
reorganisation would not fix the fundamental issue of underfunding,
it would only cause higher and higher council tax bills as seen in
other parts of the country, and indeed from some towns and
parishes, who would be expected to pick up many of the services
that district councils provided when they were abolished, or risk
them being lost.
- Despite those
challenges, this Council had kept its council tax increase modest
and within the cap at £6.96 (2.99%), this remained below
inflation and equated to a 14p per week increase—a small but
necessary adjustment to protect the Council’s vital
services.
- This budget not only
maintained the General Reserve and funded the services residents
relied on for the coming year, but it also strengthened the
financial position for the future. This Council was making a net
contribution to earmarked reserves, setting aside £2.225
million to mitigate future pressures, while carefully drawing down
£1.763 million for planned investment.
- The budget was
balanced and made provision for the future, the financial
challenges ahead remained severe. The Medium-Term Financial Plan
(MTFP) continued to forecast a deficit, and the Council must be
prepared to make difficult choices. Processes had started now with
engaging Members early, and ensuring every possible option was
considered in a measured and responsible way.
- Officers were thanked
for their outstanding work in producing this budget, and to all the
officers across the Council whose dedication had been instrumental
in this process. Their hard work was felt to be
invaluable.
Discussion took place with
regards to:
- The budget setting
had been challenging.
- The impact on rural
areas, whereas the cities seemed to be receiving a large uplift in
funding.
- The recent council
tax increases where they had Social Care duties, currently this
Council did not have those duties.
- To continue with the
Planning Strategy for house building and the funding announcement
at Easter about Junction 28 and the benefits of this to the
communities.
RESOLVED
that Cabinet recommend to Council that:
Capital Strategy and 2025/26 – 2029-30 Capital
Programme:
- That the proposed
2025/26 Capital Strategy be APPROVED –
Appendix 1;
- That a Capital
Programme consisting of new and existing projects totalling
£135,569k with a profiled spend forming a Deliverable Capital
Programme for 2025/26 of £41,614k be APPROVED– Annexes 1a, 1b and 2 to Appendix 1. (Note
this was inclusive of forecast slippage as at Quarter 3 from the
existing Capital Programme and would be finalised and formal
approval sought as part of 2025/26 Outturn report);
- The updated Capital
MTFP’s for the General Fund and Housing Revenue Account
covering the years 2026/27 to 2029/30 be NOTED.
Treasury Management Strategy:
- The proposed Treasury
Management Strategy and Annual Investment Strategy for 2025/26,
including the prudential indicators for the next 3 years and the
Minimum Revenue Provision Statement (Appendix 2) be APPROVED.
2025/26 Revenue
Budget:
- A Council Tax
Requirement of £7,348,850 calculated using a Council Tax of
£239.12 for a Band D property, an increase of £6.96 or
2.99% from 2024/25 and a Tax Base of 30,732.91, in accordance with
the Local Authorities (Calculation of Tax Base) Regulation 1992, as
amended, after the relevant adjustments in respect of the Council
tax support scheme approved by Cabinet on 12 November 2024 be
APPROVED;
- The overall budgeted
Net Cost of Services within the General Fund of £15,356,730
for 2025/26 be APPROVED
as detailed within Appendix 3 (p2 – 40) and inclusive of the
proposed balancing adjustments included within Table 1 in paragraph
5.5;
- All of the transfers
to and from Earmarked Reserves as detailed in Appendix 3 (p41) be
APPROVED;
- The HRA budget for
2025/26 as detailed within Appendix 3 (p42 – 51), with total
income of £16,058,310, less direct costs of £12,939,410
with internal charges of £2,050,250 and capital financing of
£1,068,650 balancing the budget be APPROVED;;
- Work on strategic
planning for delivering a balanced budget for 2026/27 and beyond be
commenced immediately be NOTED.
(Proposed by Cllr J Buczkowski
and seconded by Cllr S Keable)
Reason for Decision:
The 2025/26 Capital Strategy
and Capital programme, the 2025/26 Treasury Management Strategy and
the 2025/26 Revenue Budgets for the General Fund and Housing
Revenue Account were in line with the Corporate Plan priorities
within existing financial resources without materially reducing
service delivery. The Local Government Finance Act required a
balanced budget to be set by Tuesday 11 March 2025.
Note: * Report previously
circulated.