Cabinet had before it a report * from the Head of Housing and
Health setting out the proposed new policy in relation to mobility
scooters in flats.
The
Leader of the Council outlined the contents of the report with
particular reference to the following:
- The
policy had been supported by the Homes Policy Development Group
(PDG) in September, this was a new safety-led policy. The
introduction followed recent national guidance from the National
Fire Chiefs Council and locally from Devon and Somerset Fire &
Rescue Service regarding the fire risks associated with mobility
scooters in blocks of flats.
- Until recently, MDH only had one block of flats with a single
lift not in itself suited to traditional mobility scooters.
However, with the acquisition of St Georges Court in Tiverton with
its multiple, larger lifts and with the increased use of smaller,
more portable scooters there was a requirement for this policy for
the first time.
- Whilst the use of mobility scooters was recognised and the
importance of these to enable many individuals to maintain
independence and have an improved quality of life, it should be
noted they were not medical devices but defined as leisure vehicles
and as such, not prescribed by the NHS and did not meet recognised
safety standards. They were also not included within any formal,
tenant-specific ‘statement of needs’ for those with
mobility restrictions as provided by qualified, independent
occupational therapists who set out any property adaption
requirements for the Council tenants as well as those in private
sector housing. As such, mobility scooters and the provision of any
infrastructure or charging facilities to accommodate these had not
been included in the Housing Aids and Adaptions policy for many
years.
- Furthermore, MDH had an overriding, priority statutory
responsibility to uphold high standards of health and safety across
its estates. In fulfilling this duty, Housing was required to
ensure that the use of mobility vehicles within flats and communal
areas complied with all relevant legal and safety requirements and
guidance so that all tenants were protected from fire
risk.
- These risks could arise not just from fires arising from
batteries and charging but also from a potential blockage to the
safe access and egress via communal areas in flats, especially in
upper floor areas during an emergency.
- The
new policy was consistent with the Council’s long-standing
position on scooters and adapting the Council properties, MDH was
committed to equality and inclusion and recognised the vital role
these aids played in helping residents engage in daily activities
and community life.
- A
few Councils with housing stock and private housing associations
had implemented equivalent policies in recent years and these were
reviewed as part of the local policy development work.
- The
policy therefore represented a careful balancing act that ensured
tenants were safe whilst welfare needs were accommodated as far as
possible.
Discussion took place with regards to:
- Discussions about E- Bike and E-Scooters? It was explained this
was referenced within the report about the risk and the Council was
awaiting further guidance to include these, however they would have
different risks. A further report would be provided in due course
via the Home PDG.
- The
original manufacturer-supplied chargers and Portable Appliance
Testing (PAT) and replacements were supplied by the original
manufacturer/supplier.
- Restricted charging at night, from 8pm to 8am – this would
reduce the risk to those who were asleep, how would this be
enforced? It was explained that home visits would be scheduled, and
tenants would be required to comply with the policy.
RESOLVED that:
Cabinet recommends to Council to adopt the Mobility Scooter in
Flats Policy and Equality Impact Assessment contained in Annexes A
and B respectively as recommended by the Homes Policy Development
Group.
(Proposed by the Leader of the Council)
Reason for
Decision:
As a
registered provider of social housing, the Council must comply with
the regulatory standards set by the Regulator of Social Housing. In
particular, that it complied with all relevant safety legislation
including the mitigation and management of fire risks and meet the
wider requirements of the statutory Safety and Quality Standard
(consumer standard).
Note: *Report previously circulated