The Cabinet had before it and
NOTED a report * from the Climate and Sustainability
Specialist on the Council’s Carbon Footprint.
The Cabinet Member for Parish
and Community Engagement outlined the contents of the report
with particular reference to
the following:
- The
result 2% higher than the 2023-2024 carbon footprint. That increase
was down to the climate change impact linked to spending, and the
rise in construction spending had the most effect.
- The
Council had successfully cut emissions by investing in
decarbonising the Tiverton and Crediton Leisure Centres and social
housing and by doing this the Council had significantly lowered
it’s
carbon footprint.
- In
the Council’s Climate Change Strategy: the focus had been on
the elements in their control; acting on opportunities to invest;
and acting to influence those that the Council did business
with.
- The
net emissions for elements in the Council’s direct control
(comprising Council offices and facilities; transport; and offsets)
contributed to just under 9% of the 2024/25 overall total
footprint.
- The
1,589 tCO2e figure for 2024/25 was circa 35% lower than
the 2,427 tCO2e figure for the 2018/19 baseline year.
(Almost 840 tCO2e less.)
- Reductions since 2018/19 came from Council offices and
facilities (from 1,098 to 705 tCO2e); and offsets (from
0 to -420 tCO2e).
- Since 2018/19 fleet impacts had hardly changed, although the
Council now served circa 2,500 more households (from 35,650 up to
38,150).
- The
team had made rapid progress to replace old
social housing with 48 net-zero new-build homes. The procurement
relating to those construction projects would show on the
Council’s 2025-2026 carbon footprint (Scope 3 indirect i.e.
supply chain). However, that investment would reduce the annual
carbon footprint, in Scope 1 and Scope 2, by approximately 136
tonnes per year.
Discussion took place
regarding:
- How
the electric vehicles worked operationally and what was the
availability? It was explained that vehicles could be charged
whilst officers were on call out which would then provide enough
charge to get officers to where they would need to be.
- Whether a hybrid vehicle would be more suitable for that line of
work? It was explained that this may be a suitable option but that
it would also depend on the emissions used and the reduction in the
carbon footprint.
- Did
the Council have any data from other authorities to compare on the
reduction in emissions? It was explained that due to the difference
in the operations day to day it would be difficult to
compare.
- The
purchasing of the Electric Vehicle (EV) chargers and for those to
be installed through a trained electrician that worked for the
Council. It was explained that challenges may occur as some homes
may have complications when installing an EV Charger.
- How
were the Council performing in regard to
solar panels and air source heat pumps? It was explained that the
Council were liaising through the appropriate channels to meet the
Council targets.
- The
Council was in the top 20% - how many other Council’s were part of this?
- Were the
electric vehicle serviced locally? It was confirmed that they were
serviced locally.
Reason for
Decision:
The
Council’s environmental sustainability duties are underpinned
by legislation e.g. Environment Act 2021. All local authorities
have obligations under the Climate Change Act 2008 with regard to climate change adaptation
(resilience) and mitigation (emission reductions). Full Council
declared a Climate Emergency in June 2019.
Note: * Report previously
circulated.